There can be numerous causes
of rejection but when you are rejected because they said you are overqualified
you get some weird thoughts as if it’s your fault that you studied more or this
is fault of the society because most of them says you have less experience or
less qualification which definitely seems logical but what is the logic of
being over qualified.
“They said you have Seventeen
years education yet we are looking for people having less educated people so we
can’t hire you” A friend from banking sector told after being rejected from the
top bank of the country. Although private sector employers have sound reasons
to reject over qualified candidates but for government organizations it seems a
little absurd. The issue of being over
qualified job seekers has been often day by day which has lead even more number
of unemployed people sitting at home waiting for the right opportunity to come
but as said second chance is not very often. Due to the growing technology
lesser need of skilled man may cause them either quit their efforts to fit in
or take steps to make their own ground.
There are certain acceptable
reasons to discriminate the applicants on behalf of over qualification like,
Lesser jobs and more number
of applicants
The basic fear of an employer
to higher an overqualified person is if he can hire a low qualified person why
do he need to hire an over qualified with higher demand?
Increasing cost of Employment
process
The fear of employer that the
over qualified candidates may often not enjoy the work or the facilities
offered and they always look for better opportunity to avail. If they are hired
and they leave sooner or later the employer will have to run the process again,
We can't pay you enough.
They Employers assume that the applicants demand will be
much higher than the one having less qualification. Even if the applicant
convinces them on customary pay the employer still fears of him to claim sooner
or later for higher package.
You don't really understand
what the job is.
The applicants my apply
having the idea to work in a higher and well settled office yet the employer is
looking for someone to work at the front desk. Further the employee thinks that
the candidate who has been working in upper positions might not be able keep
their interest for the work.
You won't be happy working
for a manager with less experience than you.
The candidate will not be happy to work under people
having less qualification then him. Therefore the employers think he will stay
for very short period of time.
The question arises here is whether the applicant can
deal with it during the interview?
A couple of steps the applicant can take to overcome the
problem yet not for sure are
By explaining your genuine interest in the job rather
creating any kind of ambiguity for example he can convince the employer by
telling the of his limited choices of work and that he needs comparatively easy
work to carry rather than sticking into difficult one. (And that's key – it
needs to ring true for you; don't make something up.)
Most often the employer worries about salary and they
expect a bigger figure to come from the over qualified candidates. The
candidate can overcome the confusion by being explicit about salary demand.
These are some optimistic approaches to get settled even in
a low position yet the bigger issue comes when the employer don’t invite the
applicant for interview or they don’t let the applicant to express what he is
looking for.
The problem still remains there
and the Policy makers and planners should plan a policy against it before it
appears that most employees comes to be less qualified and qualified people
remains over qualified. Perhaps that will cause individuals to rethink of their
desire to think for higher qualification and skill level.
3 comments:
Lesser jobs and more number of applicants is what you said. With more and more people realizing the importance of education and the number of suitable jobs remaining the same, where ahould we go?
Secondly, rather than iviting the applicant for the job test and interview, why dont they just invite those with the relevent degree?
Publicity stunt..Sooner or later these Highly Qualified people may reach a position and than the organizations who called them for interview will have their name in circle.
What about the fact that when they tell you to apply for a post with a degree relevent to your educatiob but you got no proof to show that you meet the education level of that post. Then what?
Post a Comment